The Use of Graphing Software in the Mathematics Classroom (5)

Although no quantitative analysis of the effects of Autograph on student understanding and performance was undertaken in this study, observable changes in student behavior occurred when exploring mathematical topics using the software. This was evident when the activities were used in class and students worked individually, in pairs, or in groups. The use of Autograph helped create a dynamic environment previously unexperienced by students, keeping them actively involved and demonstrating genuine enthusiasm for exploring mathematical objects.

Using software to visually represent mathematical objects such as functions and equations is helpful, but insufficient on its own. Autograph is highly interactive, and this interactivity must be fully exploited by students to maximize its benefits. Activities must be intentionally designed to meet well-defined learning objectives with clear student instructions.

A more comprehensive quantitative and qualitative study regarding the impact of Autograph on student understanding and performance is warranted. Such research will refine how the software is integrated, guide the design of future activities, and highlight which pedagogical interventions yield the deepest conceptual understanding.

The author would like to thank all colleagues at UGRU with whom he had fruitful discussions about this work.

1. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 1999.
2. M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford, How Students Learn: History, Mathematics and Science in the Classroom, Washington D.C., National Academy Press, 2005.
3. G. B. Gearhart and M. Seltzer, "Relations Between Classroom Practices and Student Learning in the Domain of Fractions", Cognition and Instruction, 17, pp. 1-24, 1999.
4. W. H. Schmidt, C. C. McKnight, R. T. Houang, H. Wang, D. E. Wiley, and L. S. Cogan, Why Schools Matter: A Cross-national Comparison of Curriculum and Learning, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
5. S. S. Stodolsky, The Subject Matters: Classroom Activity in Math and Social Studies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.
6. A. Dendane, "Exploring Topics in Mathematics Using Computer Software", Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing (METSMaC), Abu Dhabi, UAE, March 2006.
7. A. Dendane, "Skills Needed for Mathematical Problem Solving", 10th Annual Research Conference, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE, April 2009.
8. A. H. Schoenfeld, "Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense-Making in Mathematics", Handbook for Research on Mathematics, Edited by D. D. Grouws, MacMillan, New York, 1992.
9. G. Polya, How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method, Second Edition, Penguin Books, 1990.
10. P. S. Wilson, Research Ideas for the Classroom: High School Mathematics, Chapter 4, MacMillan, 1993.
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "The Learning Principle: A Brief Introduction", 2000. Available from: http://standards.nctm.org/document/chapter2/learn.htm
12. D. Mackie, "Using Computer Algebra System to Encourage Deep Learning Approach to Calculus", Paper presented at the International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics, Hersonissos, Greece, 2002.
13. M. Dugopolski, J. Coburn, & A. G. Bluman, Algebra for College Students, McGraw-Hill, 2006.
14. J. Kaput, "Linking Representations in the Symbol Systems of Algebra", S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research Issues in the Learning and Teaching of Algebra, Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989.
15. T. P. Dick, "Symbolic-Graphical Calculators: Teaching Tools for Mathematics", School Science and Mathematics, 92, 1-9, 1994.
16. P. H. Dunham and T. P. Dick, "Connecting Research to Teaching: Research on Graphing Calculators", The Mathematics Teacher, 87, 440–445, 1994.
17. A. M. Farrell, "Teaching and Learning Behaviors in Technology-Oriented Precalculus Classrooms", doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Dissertations Abstracts International, 51, 1990.